There is an aspect of clinical supervision associated with feedback and observation forms. They are considered effective tools for evaluating how a teacher performed. Their use in assisting the same teacher to improve on his performance is questionable. This has made classroom walkthroughs preferable. They are aimed at providing an opportunity for professional development.
Instructional leadership offered in a faculty or department ensures that students perform better. It is the structures that are laid down by an institution that determines the overall performance of its students and uniformity in curriculum delivery. There must be constant evaluation of both the teaching and learning processes. A solution must involve all stakeholders in the delivery channel. This is the way to improve performance.
The walkthrough approach offers numerous advantages including availing crucial data on the core function on learning institutions. There is active participation of the teacher and leadership with the aim of improving the results other than reprimanding the teacher. The leader plays the role of a teacher at some point.
An observer or observers visit classrooms to collect evidence of a predetermined practice. The aim of such observations is to assist a department or faculty in delivery of the curriculum. The duration varies on the length of the entire sessions. It may range between two minutes and up to forty five minutes.
The pioneer of this method was Carolyn Downey who created the initial model. It has been extrapolated and modified to reflect unique aspects in each learning environment. These modifications are guided by the mandate of each institution. A common stand must be developed as the faculty evaluates the information collected. The aim is to achieve uniformity.
A walkthrough aims at reinforcing the institutional and instructional practices across the faculty. It also provides vital data on both the learning and teaching processes. This helps the institution to develop a master plan or template for delivery. It sets off discussions on important aspects within a department regarding both learning and teaching processes.
The data collected can be used to relate practices in different institutions. This tool therefore serves as a correlation accessory for participants, both internally and externally to learn. The availability of continuous feedback offers an incredible learning opportunity. It deepens understanding among stakeholders in the processes and helps them to improve on delivery.
The process of evaluation focuses on the mode of delivery instead of individual instructors. The model originally developed by Carolyn was short and laid emphasis on informal observations. Its interest was the curriculum and used collaborative means to improve performance.
Observers need a template that narrows down the areas of focus. This template should be used across all sessions under review in order to identify a cross-cutting habit or trend. The template is commonly referred to as Look-fors. It guides the observer on the areas that require attention and are important to the faculty.
It is possible to make observations from recorded material. This eliminates the need for a physical observer who is likely to influence a teacher to change normal behavior. This is a tool for strengthening the culture of the school through verified practices. Each institution is at liberty to modify its approach to suit particular needs.
Instructional leadership offered in a faculty or department ensures that students perform better. It is the structures that are laid down by an institution that determines the overall performance of its students and uniformity in curriculum delivery. There must be constant evaluation of both the teaching and learning processes. A solution must involve all stakeholders in the delivery channel. This is the way to improve performance.
The walkthrough approach offers numerous advantages including availing crucial data on the core function on learning institutions. There is active participation of the teacher and leadership with the aim of improving the results other than reprimanding the teacher. The leader plays the role of a teacher at some point.
An observer or observers visit classrooms to collect evidence of a predetermined practice. The aim of such observations is to assist a department or faculty in delivery of the curriculum. The duration varies on the length of the entire sessions. It may range between two minutes and up to forty five minutes.
The pioneer of this method was Carolyn Downey who created the initial model. It has been extrapolated and modified to reflect unique aspects in each learning environment. These modifications are guided by the mandate of each institution. A common stand must be developed as the faculty evaluates the information collected. The aim is to achieve uniformity.
A walkthrough aims at reinforcing the institutional and instructional practices across the faculty. It also provides vital data on both the learning and teaching processes. This helps the institution to develop a master plan or template for delivery. It sets off discussions on important aspects within a department regarding both learning and teaching processes.
The data collected can be used to relate practices in different institutions. This tool therefore serves as a correlation accessory for participants, both internally and externally to learn. The availability of continuous feedback offers an incredible learning opportunity. It deepens understanding among stakeholders in the processes and helps them to improve on delivery.
The process of evaluation focuses on the mode of delivery instead of individual instructors. The model originally developed by Carolyn was short and laid emphasis on informal observations. Its interest was the curriculum and used collaborative means to improve performance.
Observers need a template that narrows down the areas of focus. This template should be used across all sessions under review in order to identify a cross-cutting habit or trend. The template is commonly referred to as Look-fors. It guides the observer on the areas that require attention and are important to the faculty.
It is possible to make observations from recorded material. This eliminates the need for a physical observer who is likely to influence a teacher to change normal behavior. This is a tool for strengthening the culture of the school through verified practices. Each institution is at liberty to modify its approach to suit particular needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment